 | | Re: Age limitations —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) Hmm, is that what Tamy was suggesting? I thought she was suggesting that NELUG lower its age range from 18+ to 16+ (or whatever, maybe even abolishing the age limitation completely) and that adults start a new group (either separate or as a (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Age limitations —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | | | (...) In other words, she's saying that the people who are currently in the group and who like it as it is should go and form their own group, and the current group changes. I think that's a bit backwards, personally. (...) Well, I wouldn't. Not (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Age limitations —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | (...) Well I think that would not be fair to the current membership. NELUG was started with a purpose and we defined that pretty well I think. I think to force us to change the rule for NELUG and force adults to start another group is unfair to (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Age limitations —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | (...) there (...) You guys just aren't getting it are you??? Here, I'll spell it out! The thought of the adults starting another group is just as stupid as the thought of the Jr.Afol's starting another group.. It just won't happen will it? (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Age limitations —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) Not in Massachusetts. (...) Which group of people is that? We were being completely peaceful. Even Shiri was being peaceful, and then all of the sudden a bunch of non-NELUG people showed up and started yelling at us. I see how that damages (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Age limitations —Josiah Nicely
|
| | | | | | After reading all 299 some odd posts, my head hurts. I do have one request: Eric, I know I have briefly discussed this age issue with you ( mostly just getting backgorund ), and since I am coming into the area the week after next anyway, would you (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | For People new to NELUG (was: Re: Age limitations) —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | (...) Joe you are more than welcome to come to our meeting on the 12th. First I would like to say that I know there are going to be a lot of new faces at the meeting which is exciting and shows there is a lot of passion for the subject matter being (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: For People new to NELUG (was: Re: Age limitations) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, they have the new giant soft LEGO bricks there (the ones DACTA makes) and maybe we can all chip in to buy some and hit each other with them if we get into arguments. :) :) :) --Todd (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: For People new to NELUG (was: Re: Age limitations) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) LOL :) Broadcast the meet in realtime online and I'll pick it up at Legoland. I might feel like hurling a few ICBB [1]'s myself. ;) ...j/k [1] Inter-Continental Ballistic Bricks XFUT: off-topic.fun -Tim (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Age limitations —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | (...) We have. No matter what decision is reached, don't think it will be reached lightly. Also be aware that the last time this issue was brought up, it was discussed seriously. (...) How is NELUG responsible for any of this? Our policy is not (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | |
