Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:47:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1448 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us, Richard W. Schamus writes:
> We cannot and should not direct what should be practical to another group
> organization. It's their Group. WAMALUG has provisions in it's "Constitution"
> that could potentially limit entry of anyone that we cannot get along with, as
> distasteful as that seems. It is, I'm afraid, a neccessary evil, to promote
> the common good. Unfortunately, it is what keeps good things from going
> horroribly, horroribly wrong.
I don't think it is at all unreasonable for a groups policies or whatever to
specify how membership is attained, and how and why it can be revoked. This is
crucial to maintaining the stability of the organization should a problem
arise.
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) it's "Constitution" (...) as (...) Exactly my point in referencing the specific neccessary evil. It IS crucial to maintaining the stability of an organization to rectify things that go wrong when they ARISE. I'm sure exclusion to prevent (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) I've read about half of the posts and I can see this is turning/has turned ugly. I'm not gonna get into, 1) Opinion, 2) Justice/fairness, 3) Legalities. I'll just say how I feel about it. I never had a dark age, much like Shiri. I know what it (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
