Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:56:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1466 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us, Frank Filz writes:
> In lugnet.org.us, Richard W. Schamus writes:
> > We cannot and should not direct what should be practical to another group
> > organization. It's their Group. WAMALUG has provisions in • it's "Constitution"
> > that could potentially limit entry of anyone that we cannot get along with, • as
> > distasteful as that seems. It is, I'm afraid, a neccessary evil, to promote
> > the common good. Unfortunately, it is what keeps good things from going
> > horroribly, horroribly wrong.
>
> I don't think it is at all unreasonable for a groups policies or whatever to
> specify how membership is attained, and how and why it can be revoked. This is
> crucial to maintaining the stability of the organization should a problem
> arise.
>
> Frank
Exactly my point in referencing the specific neccessary evil. It IS crucial to
maintaining the stability of an organization to rectify things that go wrong
when they ARISE.
I'm sure exclusion to prevent problems from arising is a wonderful thing to
some people. It is a double edge sword obviously. It keeps out new ideas as
well.
My main point was, let's not say what NELUG should do, let see what we can do
in the face of NELUG's unwaiverable stance.
I say, let them take their stance, but I also say, let's do something decent
for Shiri as well.Rich
--
Have Fun! C-Ya!
Legoman34
*****
Legoman34 (Richard W. Schamus)... (No, I don't work for TLC, but I want
to...)
BRICKFEST 2001 IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER... START MAKING PLANS TODAY.
Card carrying LUGNET MEMBER: #70
Visit http://www.wamalug.org &
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Castle/1334
...(the wait is over...)
..."The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself." ...
*****
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) I guess my point is that I don't see it as a necessary _evil_. I think it is just plain necessary. Frank (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) I don't think it is at all unreasonable for a groups policies or whatever to specify how membership is attained, and how and why it can be revoked. This is crucial to maintaining the stability of the organization should a problem arise. Frank (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
