| |
All right,
After watching this evolve for a few hours from the (mostly silent) sidelines,
and getting a general idea about opinions, I'll post another one.
As much as I want the NELUG members to include me, I certainly do NOT want to
corner them into inviting me. In a way, I'd rather be excluded than being
included just because it's been raising a lot of issues. Does that make sense?
I appreciate Matt's level-headed comments, and I appreciate the support that
people showed for my stand.
I hope that the NELUG members take this into account, but I hope they make
whatever decisions according to what *they* think. I sure don't want them to
invite me out of pity or something, and not out of feeling of obligation.
-Shiri (who's off to read Lar's post... looks like he agrees)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| After reading Shiri's eloquent posts, I figured out a possible solution to the age problem. Not really anybody can be unsympathetic to Shiri's cause, but there is the other side of the coin. The concerns about the maturity of members is legitimate. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
