| |
In lugnet.org.us, Tim Courtney writes:
> In lugnet.org.us, Matthew Miller writes:
> > > before, just being a third party, I feel that this is VERY arrogant on • NELUG's
> > > part as a whole...I think we'd all be satisfied if this were taken case by
> > > case; have a member vote. Is the person mature enough to be in NELUG? And,
> >
> > We had a member vote. It was unanimous that we would draw the line at 18.
>
> That was then, this is now. Though I'm not denying your unanimous vote, but
> if the rest of NELUG still feels the same on the issue, I'd sure like to see
> their support for you now. You appear to be the _only_ one sticking up for
> the position. I would say that it is time for another vote on the matter.
> And yes, it should be NELUG making the decision, but weigh carefully what has
> been said here.
You know what? LUGNET is a terrific place in the woolly Internet on account of
the volume level doesn't get much louder than this.
Matt might be the _only_ one sticking up for this position because it's July 3
and everybody is not hooked up to LUGNET constantly. Maybe they're off watching
Battlestar Galactica episodes they missed the first time around, or whatever,
who knows.
I can only conjecture about what NELUG wants to be, because I've never met with
them. Frank talks about his "somewhat vested interest", but really, has Frank
joined the club or not?
I'm not chiding any one person, but: it's not polite to tell other people they
have obligations they haven't chosen, or demand that they justify themselves to
you.
Shiri asked pretty nicely and I sympathize with her position.
-Erik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) with (...) I haven't joined, and in all seriousness, probably would not join because of this rule (and note that my main vested interest in a New England/Boston based LUG would be to point my nephew, who is under 18, to). (...) to (...) Well, (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) NELUG's (...) That was then, this is now. Though I'm not denying your unanimous vote, but if the rest of NELUG still feels the same on the issue, I'd sure like to see their support for you now. You appear to be the _only_ one sticking up for (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
