 | | Re: CFD: Subgroups for lugnet.org.us & lugnet.trains.org —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) Oh, I definitely agree -- a group probably wouldn't want absolutely positively everything always to have to be 100% publicly readable... especially if it had lots of cursing and things like that. :) But I wonder how you go about actually (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.org.us)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CFD: Subgroups for lugnet.org.us & lugnet.trains.org —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) However the mailing list software I am familiar with (Listproc and Majordomo) require you to be a subscriber in order to access the archives (or at least can be, and usually are, configured that way). (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.org.us)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CFD: Subgroups for lugnet.org.us & lugnet.trains.org —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) So anyone can still subscribe, snoop through the archives, then unsubscribe on a whim...? That's not private. --Todd (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.org.us)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFD: Subgroups for lugnet.org.us & lugnet.trains.org —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) I think most mailers give you the option of automatically allowing subscribes, OR of requiring a human to approve the subscribe. Not MUCH better but a bit. Most large lists run as automatically allowing subscribes, though. (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.org.us)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CFD: Subgroups for lugnet.org.us & lugnet.trains.org —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <383B39A3.DB5A938C@v...er.net>... (...) unsubscribe (...) I run two club lists on Majordomo which are "closed" which means I (or one of the other people the list owner id forwards to, or in fact anyone who knows the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.org.us)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CFD: Subgroups for lugnet.org.us & lugnet.trains.org —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | (...) only archiving, or no archiving. We chose to leave the archives open to everyone. I guess if we ever wanted to take a discussion out of the public eyes, we could just start a discussion by "replying to all recipients" or something. I do like (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.org.us)
|
| | | | |
