 | | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
|
(...) No (...) Agreed (...) I just wouldn't use that kind of terminology (...) Granted any promises that me be implied by Eric would be illegitamate and the need for Eric to come forward and admit his transgressions are clear."Legal measures" that's (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
|
-snip- (...) Do you really think I'm trying to control the discussion here? Honestly.. is that what you think? By "legitimate" - I am only meaning that someone should not show themselves to represent the whole group when they only represent (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
|
(...) Obviously Eric's post was inappropriate. Had you merely stated that Eric did not represent the organization. And, that all inquiries could be directed to SciBrick this may not have happened. (...) The question you have to ask is why have they (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
|
(...) I never claimed to actually be smart enough to stay out of it. I know just enough to stay on the fringe and observe. (...) -Brian (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
|
(...) I agree.. which is exactly why I have always been holding out for the possibility of a mass cancellation. Is this entire discussion something that really needs to be preserved in the Lugnet database forever? I should hope not. (...) Brian, I (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
