Subject:
|
Re: Gallery image size
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.vlc
|
Date:
|
Sun, 14 May 2000 00:10:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
988 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.vlc, Xandria Husby writes:
>
> Thanks much. I would have had more torture devices, but lacked time. What • size
> pictures would be best? They are grabbed at 640 X 480, then I shrink them to • 320 X
> 240 -- then thumbnails are made of the latter. The tiny thumbnails can be • clicked
> on to view the 320 X 240 image. Do you think they should be even larger than
> that? Please let me know what you and others think. Feedback is a good
thing.
Great display, bigger pics would be better.
High percentage of torture devices and castley things would make the VLC
my type of group.(Sydney,Australia is a bit of a swim though).
The Sydney AFOL group are having their third meeting at my place on 4th June.
We will have pics up soon after linked to Richard Parson's Port Block site.
pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Gallery image size
|
| (...) Thanks much. I would have had more torture devices, but lacked time. What size pictures would be best? They are grabbed at 640 X 480, then I shrink them to 320 X 240 -- then thumbnails are made of the latter. The tiny thumbnails can be clicked (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
