Subject:
|
Re: Gallery image size
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.vlc
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 May 2000 16:46:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1082 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.vlc, Xandria Husby writes:
> >
> > Wow, those are really cool torture devices! I really liked that Iron
> > Maiden. ;) The castles are great, too. I hope you can get some more,
> > bigger, pictures of them. It looks like you all had a lot of fun! :)
>
> Thanks much. I would have had more torture devices, but lacked time.
I know how that is. :) I started my castle months ago, and still haven't
finished it... :\
> What size pictures would be best? They are grabbed at 640 X 480, then I
> shrink them to 320 X 240 -- then thumbnails are made of the latter. The tiny
> thumbnails can be clicked on to view the 320 X 240 image. Do you think they
> should be even larger than that?
640x480 is probably best for detail vs. size. If you have a limited amount of
server space, you can always upload the larger images to Brickshelf, like we
(Wamalug) have: <http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=96>
> Please let me know what you and others think. Feedback is a good thing.
> Thanks.
Always glad to help! :)
> > I also looked at some of the older Meeting pictures, and I gotta say, you've
> > got some really talented people up there. I especially liked Optimus Prime.
> > :) I can't wait to see more pictures!
>
> I'm very proud to be surrounded by such creative people. Everyone's so
> inspiring.
I feel the same way about Wamalug's members. :)
Jeff
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Gallery image size
|
| (...) Thanks much. I would have had more torture devices, but lacked time. What size pictures would be best? They are grabbed at 640 X 480, then I shrink them to 320 X 240 -- then thumbnails are made of the latter. The tiny thumbnails can be clicked (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
