Subject:
|
Re: C$: Knowledge-Based Approach
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:41:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
485 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
> I'm torn between openly discussing this with you, and keeping my "secret" a secret!!
>
> damn this competition.
Ah haha. I know what you mean. My rule of thumb has been that if I think it's a
strategy or coding concept that everyone is likely to come up with on their own,
then I don't mind discussing it. Any specifics are out, basically.
I don't care if you know that I evaluate four-five turns in advance, and look
for groups, threats, and wins... as long as you have no idea how I do it or how
long it takes. :)
Mike
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: C$: Knowledge-Based Approach
|
| (...) I disagree..... if I tell you that I ply 3 deep, you just have to code to 4 or 5 deep. you now have a better chance over me. if I say I have done the research and use the Slabovian concept, you know to counter with the "Upper Un-gabumba Land" (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: C$: Knowledge-Based Approach
|
| (...) although this game has taught me more about game theory than I care to discuss, I'm taking a wait and see approach re: Victor. I'm torn between openly discussing this with you, and keeping my "secret" a secret!! damn this competition. :) (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
