Subject:
|
Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto15a/b Tentative Rules Posted
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:53:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
486 times
|
| |
|
|
Arrg! Lugnet is takeing email posts.
Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> 3) A single sensor line (both robot sensor ports connected together) This is
> the same as option 2, but when a robot signals End Of Turn, the signal must
> be a short pulse, and the turn is not "complete" until the end of the pulse
> (when the button is released)
Option 3 is probably the best for and arbiter robot to listen in on. Assuming
this works. Because the sensor port will be powered by both RCXs and the
control lab or RCX arbiter. What will this do to the reading of the sensor
port?
> > b) Scoring method. Like speed chess, raw winner.
> Options(?):
> 1) Wins then (if tied) lowest average time per move
No, there should be ties allowed, because its much easier to build a robot that
plays for a tie then the win. We need to encourage winning by winning the game
not getting a tie quickly.
> 2) Speed Chess with xx time limit per player
Definitely. If you take more then your allotted time you loose. We need to
decide on this time soon, because the approach you take for your algorithm is
very dependent on the time available.
> I don't think the web site says anything about each pair of robots playing
> two games. Is that up for debate? (they should play two)
I agree with this too.
Player A Player B Winner
win-win loss-loss A
win-tie loss-tie A
win-loss lose-win tie
tie-tie tie-tie tie
Derek
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
