 | | Re: rtlToronto15: Pipe Racers Pro Concept —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) "shortest" path? At the marked T just to the left of the right support leg, the path leads upward, but if the robot were to remain traveling to the right, it would rejoin the marked path much closer to the end, avoiding a whole section of (...) (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: rtlToronto15: Pipe Racers Pro Concept —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) I wasn't even thinking about a 'bot along those lines, but that's way easier than what I was picturing in my head... Thanks Larry! Dave K -who now likes the straight 't' design instead of putting in 'y' connectors... (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: rtlToronto15: Pipe Racers Pro Concept —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | (...) Yes. There was always a required path and in a previous incarnation: (URL) required path was the shortest path, because it was the ONLY path. The problem is the pictured construction is very difficult to build. (...) That's right. If you could (...) (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: rtlToronto15: Pipe Racers Pro Concept —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | Dan Boger caught something I missed: The return path from the other way has to exist and be marked too if two robots are going to run head to head... Calum (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: rtlToronto15: Pipe Racers Pro Concept —John Gerlach
|
| | | | (...) Or, mark each path to the midway point, then the 'bot needs to figure out the rest of the path based on the path it took to the middle... Could a 'bot leave pieces behind as some sort of trap/misdirection for the opponent 'bot? JohnG, GMLTC (...) (21 years ago, 26-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
