 | | Re: did everyone have fun at mel's —Rob Stehlik
| | | | (...) Wow, three RCX's to play with, and you would let yourself get beat by someone who only has one?? I have lots of ideas for blockstackers, but I think I should just stick to the semi workable idea I had from last time. Maybe I could build (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: did everyone have fun at mel's —Chris Magno
| | | | | (...) Ohhhhhh was that a shot ???? (grin) what are you trying to say, that a remote controlled robot is not allowed? I'll have you know that I'm entering the exact same robot except maybe I'll add code this time. (grin) (...) seriously.... I'm (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: did everyone have fun at mel's —Rob Stehlik
| | | | | (...) Well, maybe it was a shot. No, just kidding. Make sure youre robot works next time, and wow me. (...) Faster better cheaper like NASA's recent probe to Mars?? just kidding. I guess I thought it would need two rcx's to control the mutiple (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | pnumatics —Chris Magno
| | | | | (...) ummm close, faster, better cheaper to mars, but more the the one that made it, not the one that crashed. (...) yes it is a "circuit" its actually quite simple. I'll post lots of info if only you and others promise not to use the ideas in there (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | |
