Subject:
|
Re: START BUILDING -- next contest
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 29 Mar 2002 03:33:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
495 times
|
| |
|
|
Chris Magno wrote:
>
> oh, I think the tables will be at full height...... just like we did
> for monkeys. we have not lost a robot to the games yet.
We are, of course, "conveniently" ignoring MY robot. :)
>
> I have to ask, if the gap going to be 8 inches, where is the challenge
> in making a robot 18 inches?? that's why we choose the 12 inch maximum
> size. I'll listen to your arguments though.
Well, I have an idea that should fit within the 12 inch rule.
Dave, remember that Chris said "fits within a 1' cube". This means that
your robot could be up to ~20 inches long (only if you make it very thin
at the ends though).
>
> --
> Chris
> Pretend this says something funny
>
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: START BUILDING -- next contest
|
| (...) I apologize again! I swear my IR control of your robot was a complete accident. We used to be a lot better about that sort of thing back in the rtl3/4/5 timeframe, people would yell like "fire in the hole" before using any IR downloading. But (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: START BUILDING -- next contest
|
| (...) (evil grin) oh, I think the tables will be at full height...... just like we did for monkeys. we have not lost a robot to the games yet. sure we lost a few to some stairs and streetcar tracks; but we don't talk about that in public. :) (...) (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
