 | | Re: Project X and game play
|
|
(...) I prefer having them all run at once. I think that if we run the robots often enough, everyone will get a chance to see all the robots doing their thing. I don't think I've ever seen a competition where this is done. It'd be wild to see a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project X and game play
|
|
(...) no...considering that half the 'bots don't use the RCX 1.0 (with the AC adapter). (...) That, and it would allow the "stragglers" to see the robots in action. And I would have a pretty "easy" day. The problem with that is possible IR (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project X and game play
|
|
"David Schilling" <davidNO@SPAMsunteleia.com> wrote in message news:GpnB65.51M@lugnet.com... (...) time (...) Wait, 20 starting configurations? Do you mean random patterns? I thought we decided we were having one pattern that would be run throughout (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project X and game play
|
|
(...) The way that is currently stated on the page is: -A set of Starting Patterns is chosen somehow (submissions in a hat, random, whatever). -Each round, everyone runs the same Starting Pattern. ie, if the first Starting Pattern of the day is a O, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project X and game play
|
|
(...) OOPS. Iain, I thought it was understood that for every "round" it would be a new and different pattern. it would be boring to watch the same robot do solve the same pattern over and over again. Besides, any logic program you come up with to (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
