Subject:
|
Re: K, that's it! We're doing it!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:12:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
829 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> At 09:29 AM 10/12/06, Dave wrote:
> > I'm running a LEGO
> > battlebot competition
>
> hmm. Maybe worth a trip to Canada.
>
>
>
> > Build an autonomous robot to partake in a fierce battle with other 'bots.
> >
> > Your robot must have the ability to MOVE all by itself at the beginning of the
> > competition--this'll stop the 'Hey, it's a giant stack of 2x4 blocks!
> >
> > Your robot must fit in the 8 x 8 arena, and leave room for other 'bots--'cause
> > it's hard to get a score with other 'bots if they can't fit in the arena.
> >
> > Compeitions will run aroun 3-5 minutes, depending on potential 'Wow--didya see
> > that spectacular hit!!' factors
> >
> > A round of votes at the end of hte match will determine the winner.
>
> I'd think there should be at least a couple rules, to keep people
> (like me) from building robot that are just stupid-big.
>
> Something like 12x12 inches and 3 to 5 lbs should be plenty for most.
>
> Also, if I may suggest, what about doing like they did in
> Battle-Bots, where the robot will be counted out, if it doesn't move
> within about 10 seconds. (this would not count two robots that are
> entangled) This kind of eliminates your "bot must move" rule.
>
> Those are just my thoughts. Value them as you will.
>
> Yes, some good LEGO carnage sounds interesting.
>
> Steve
K, I like Steve's idea--I was going for the 24 by 24 with the 18+ battery boxes,
but to keep things reasonable, the 12 x 12 is a perfectly good restriction
3-5 pounds? that's tough 'cause I remember building my tug o' war 'bot and
trying to get it under 1.5--no fun at all. 3 pounds? double my last 'bot?
that's just 2 more motors, another RCX and some bricks--not doing it for me.
We'll see what other people say about a weight restriction
I also like the 'canot be stopped for more than 10 seconds'. This would, of
course, also mean *any* movement--like Chris's claw arm in the first 'battlebot'
competition that we all loved--it was the only part of his 'bot still able to
move ;)
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: K, that's it! We're doing it!!
|
| (...) I started with 3. Then I thought about it, and went 3 to 5. Once you get beyond 5 or 6 pounds (with LEGO) then people are just being excessive. And, I know excessive. (...) Robot with melted clutch gear = not good Terminator-style claw still (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: K, that's it! We're doing it!!
|
| (...) hmm. Maybe worth a trip to Canada. (...) I'd think there should be at least a couple rules, to keep people (like me) from building robot that are just stupid-big. Something like 12x12 inches and 3 to 5 lbs should be plenty for most. Also, if I (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
