Subject:
|
Re: Our the R-games too hard?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:49:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
849 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
>
> Do we make the games to hard? If we had a simpler "less" complex game
> would the games run smother?
>
>
> I dont mean a "simple" game. As an example, I mean, something like tug
> of war, BUT not with the free rope part.
>
>
> Chris
I think we have had a few 'really hard' competitions--C$ comes immediately to
mind
And how many entries did we have?
And a 'relatively' easy one--rope climbing--what--2 entries?
We've ran block/marble stacking/sorting numerous times and we get a wide range
of 'bots competing.
And lest we forget the anti-x (still my fav. pic of all 'bot competitions) and
we had 13ish entries...
Nyaah, I think rtl is doing jsut fine with the 'bot competitions. If anything,
we should do what we did over the first few rtl 'bot days--two different
events--east (sumo/drag racing/whatever) and the harder ones.
But then we're into greater logistics...
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Our the R-games too hard?
|
| (...) How about 2 TTT games... 3x3 for the dummies like me, and 4x4 for smarter people. Make them both marbles and just extend the grid. Some might make theirs compete on both based on different programs (or the same, with some different logic)... (...) (18 years ago, 10-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Our the R-games too hard?
|
| Do we make the games to hard? If we had a simpler "less" complex game would the games run smother? I dont mean a "simple" game. As an example, I mean, something like tug of war, BUT not with the free rope part. Chris (18 years ago, 9-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
