| |
David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote:
>
> > So...
> >
> > I've spent about half an hour every night this past week building octagons. I
> > hate Lego geometry with a passion now. :)
> >
> > I was wondering who else was building for this contest? I know Chris is
> > obviously gung ho about it...but anyone else up for some block transferring fun?
> >
> > Calum
>
>
> no one here but us scarecrows...
>
> Dave K
> http://sandysparky.net/blog/00000403.php
WOW dave, it would seem we are following the same paths.
I built a Kilough Platform, it was nice, had great "plans," then, poof.
I discovered that it would not take the weight of my EOAT, or the 6
Transfer Openings.
So, I, like you, have opted for a A/B skid steed bot, but wanted to
"jazz it up" so I built my first ever Adder Subtracter.
Let me tell you, ADD/SUB's are a "strange" beast. It took a while to
"get it" but once i saw it working, it does track a straight line.
heck, my original code that I posted with my prototype some months ago,
slotted right into my platform and "worked"
AS WELL, with a 12" SQUARE bot, i can still get my 6 TO's around the
rim, heck, i could put 8 if i wanted too. but I am leaving the "front"
for the LX sensors and the EOAT. (1)
Chris
1. which is SO SIMPLE its not even funny. (no batterys, NO RCX, and
only 3 moving parts)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: rtl20 Rollcall?
|
| (...) K' this is just creepy.... I wanted to try something other than a straight A/B skid-steer and also put together a adder/subtracter drive platform I've been using for testing light sensor positioning, etc. (URL) This was before I added more (...) (19 years ago, 8-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
