| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) Yes. Calum (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) Ya, but then we wouldn't have seen that funny penny-arcade comic. :-( Derek (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
Calum Tsang wrote: > In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: > > >>MORE specifialy. it could be a safe assumption that if your bot can >>launch a block over more than 8 feet of the play area, and still hit a >>childs eye with enough force to (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) No, I just wanted clarification. 16 studs on centre is fine with me. (...) I'm happy with that. (...) So you are saying there should be clearance for a EOAT to enter to at least 4 studs into the TO. But as long as my TO opening is 8 studs by 7 (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
|
(...) I would agree on Chris' interpretation. We'll update the page if no one objects. (...) I forgot to highlight it in "read" but I figured it needed to be debated. I think it must be a uniform colour and in fact I think that colour should be (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|