| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
<snip>
>
> IT WAS ME!!!!
>
> i did it for my Project X
>
> it worked fantasticly as a way for my 3 RCX's to communicate.
>
> all i did was pulse the on/float thing and count the pulses.
>
> its a FANTASTIC way to do things.
>
> Chris
It's turning out to be a fantastic way for me as well (hopefully)
So here's the results--
Using the 2 lights connected in series to create a cable connecting motor A to
Sensor 1 and Sensor 1 is set on light and raw data--
Motor A out forward full -- Sensor 1 reads 1023
Motor A out float -- Sensor 1 reads 10-20
Motor A out reverse full -- Sensor 1 reads 0
and when the program's not running -- Sensor 1 hops between 8 and 10
Interesting....
I hope with continued use I don't blow Sensor 1
We shall see...
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: RCX expertise
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) After running the layout all evening, and having the motor output wired thru lights to sensor 1, the program ran flawlessly. Now I will state that if you try this on your own RCX and blow (...) (19 years ago, 18-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: RCX expertise
|
| (...) IT WAS ME!!!! i did it for my Project X it worked fantasticly as a way for my 3 RCX's to communicate. all i did was pulse the on/float thing and count the pulses. its a FANTASTIC way to do things. Chris (19 years ago, 17-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
