To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 1351
1350  |  1352
Subject: 
Re: Track elevation
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Sat, 16 Jun 2001 03:59:31 GMT
Viewed: 
756 times
  
"Jeff Elliott" <jeffe@telepres.com> wrote in message
news:3B2A6D56.CD75EB5D@telepres.com...

Here are the numbers:

Rise Rise Run 6 segs delta
(plates)(cm) (studs) (studs) (studs)
0 0.00 16.000 96.000 0.000
1 0.32 15.995 95.970 0.030
2* 0.64 15.980 95.880 0.120*
3 0.96 15.955 95.730 0.270
4 1.28 15.920 95.519 0.481
5 1.60 15.875 95.247 0.753
6 1.92 15.819 94.914 1.086

* - the ratio I usually use

The 'delta' number is how many studs I expect to be off over the course
of a full module.  Not a big deal.

<snip>

Based on the [relatively minor, I supose] difficulties we had at train1 with
an incline on the far side of the layout, how do you think we will cope with
these elevations?

    Iain



Message is in Reply To:
  Track elevation
 
Hi guys, In planning modules, I've been taken with the idea of elevating some portion of the track. So I did some math to determine how much difference sloping a track makes in its run length. I typically use a slope of 2 plates per segment when I (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR