Subject:
|
Re: Jiggling steve's balls with a vibrator
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:53:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
494 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Brian Davis wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
>
> > one battery box, one motor
> > always on.
> >
> > i dont get it?
>
> Don't get me wrong, it's a workable solution - but it uses at least one
> battery box, and one motor, and at this point I'm actually running out of
> motors... and battery boxes... and technic beams, for that matter. Also,
> honestly, I like Dave's solution for it's elegance. One motor, two functions,
> flawless operation. Jus-telegant.
Thanks for that--making the hopper was the lengthly part--the actual ball pump,
after the initial setup, needed little tweaking. The hopper, on the other hand,
was very difficult to get working with many or few balls in it.
Now it's just fun to watch :)
>
> > As for the "walking" my soloution is simple 2 words.
> >
> > Double sided carpet tape
>
> Which two of those four words were your solution ;-)? Actually, I have used
> double-sided mounting squares for one of my modules (the forklift; I needed some
> way to secure the crate-holding structures).
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Jiggling steve's balls with a vibrator
|
| (...) Don't get me wrong, it's a workable solution - but it uses at least one battery box, and one motor, and at this point I'm actually running out of motors... and battery boxes... and technic beams, for that matter. Also, honestly, I like Dave's (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
