Subject:
|
Re: Jiggling steve's balls with a vibrator
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:17:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1053 times
|
| |
|
|
Brian Davis wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
>
>
> > useing a vibrator is a good way to unstuck, stuck balls?
>
>
> I think that would work... if it didn't cause the module to "walk" away from
> its neighboring modules. Currently, there is no mechanical connection between
> the GBCms, so excessive vibration may result in misalignment over time. Also, it
> takes a motor - most of the "unsticking" systems I've seen are like Dave's, in
> that they use one motor for two functions, a lift as well as a "jam busting"
> mechanism.
um,
one battery box,
one motor
always on.
i dont get it?
As for the "walking" my soloution is simple 2 words.
Double sided carpet tape
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Jiggling steve's balls with a vibrator
|
| (...) Don't get me wrong, it's a workable solution - but it uses at least one battery box, and one motor, and at this point I'm actually running out of motors... and battery boxes... and technic beams, for that matter. Also, honestly, I like Dave's (...) (20 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Jiggling steve's balls with a vibrator
|
| (...) I think that would work... if it didn't cause the module to "walk" away from its neighboring modules. Currently, there is no mechanical connection between the GBCms, so excessive vibration may result in misalignment over time. Also, it takes a (...) (20 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
