 | | Re: Jiggling steve's balls with a vibrator —Brian Davis
| | | | (...) I think that would work... if it didn't cause the module to "walk" away from its neighboring modules. Currently, there is no mechanical connection between the GBCms, so excessive vibration may result in misalignment over time. Also, it takes a (...) (20 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Jiggling steve's balls with a vibrator —Chris Magno
| | | | | (...) um, one battery box, one motor always on. i dont get it? As for the "walking" my soloution is simple 2 words. Double sided carpet tape (20 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Jiggling steve's balls with a vibrator —Brian Davis
| | | | | (...) Don't get me wrong, it's a workable solution - but it uses at least one battery box, and one motor, and at this point I'm actually running out of motors... and battery boxes... and technic beams, for that matter. Also, honestly, I like Dave's (...) (20 years ago, 17-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Jiggling steve's balls with a vibrator —David Koudys
| | | | | (...) Thanks for that--making the hopper was the lengthly part--the actual ball pump, after the initial setup, needed little tweaking. The hopper, on the other hand, was very difficult to get working with many or few balls in it. Now it's just fun (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | |
