To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 1262
1261  |  1263
Subject: 
Re: R8 and soon R9
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 01:00:28 GMT
Viewed: 
416 times
  
Why couldn't the robot just have a pole on it, that hits the button when it
runs into it?


the point of making it "hard" to hit the button is to force the robot to
do something other then, swing forward.   with a button placed at "some
point" then people are "forced" to use an RCX.  the whole reason we have
these games is to give us a GOAL, a challenge too build something.  if
it was a game of JUST monkey across, then I'd bet  $1  that you (Iain)
could do it in your sleep, with just battery box logic..


Chris
Visit my newly revamped walker page @
http://www.members.home.net/cmagno/technics/index.htm



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: R8 and soon R9
 
"Chris Magno" <cmagno@home.com> wrote in message news:3B240F3D.2883BA...ome.com... (...) Why couldn't the robot just have a pole on it, that hits the button when it runs into it? (or would the button be mounted vertically under the robot or (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

7 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR