 | | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
(...) See, trying to keep my head down so as to not rock the boat anymore--but I thought about this after I saw Calums pic and I thought taht what Rob said could work better, so I'll just agree with him. As for the scoring issue--lets see if I got (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
(...) Okay, I'll change it. (...) Assuming your roll of the global dice gives you that sample that's 1:1. You could come up lucky and get all your colour just for pushing them in. Anyone else want to weigh in on "no tower creation" Steve is yes, (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
(...) More flip flopping then John Kerry has been accused of on this one. I thought David said it's a block stacking competition, you should get points for stacking blocks. (URL) another note, I don't like the negative score idea personally. I'd (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 - new plan
|
|
Ok, I came up with a loophole over lunch. Here's a slightly new plan: 1) Fabulousi sequence for stacked blocks OF THE CORRECT COLOuR 2) +1 for blocks at home of correct coloUr 3) -1 for blocks at home of wrong coloUr See below... (...) New score: (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) I thought of that--what if the opponent gets all 30 blocks onto his square without stacking. That'd be 30 points for him (assuming that there was no wrong colour there) I would have to (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
(...) Well, I could have been adamant, but that would have disenfranchesed the voters--i mean the other competitors, and also figuring there was those that can't make a block stacking 'bot but wanted to enter--I was quite adamant that it was block (...) (20 years ago, 28-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
(...) I say no. Pushing blocks around is lame. The purpose of the competition should be stacking blocks. Rob (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
(...) I agree with Rob. You’re either stacking blocks or you’re not. Pushing blocks is definitely lame. That said, it doesn’t really matter to me because at 8x8x8, I have no interest. (20 years ago, 29-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
(...) I've got the headphones CRANKED and am listening to the FULL version of this: (URL) some vain attempt to regain my dwindling youth, DUB DUB, ya'll .---...---new topic---...--- OK, really. someone call me and explain why we FORGET the +1 -1 if (...) (20 years ago, 30-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
So can we make the rule set FINAL? No more changes on scoring? Everyone happy? (....time to start looking for loopholes.... BWAHAHAHAHA...) -Rob A. (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto18 Draft Ruleset Posted
|
|
(...) I think we're more or less settled on this. Calum (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
