 | | Re: Sumo-Train Competition
|
|
(...) Um, I think you would want to avoid those you were likely to lose and accelerate for those that you were likely to do well in... (if you clip the tail end of the other train at speed striking a square blow, you are likely to do well... if you (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Sumo-Train Competition
|
|
(...) Pardon? Collision avoidance in a train sumo event.... Nahhhhhhh :) Perhaps collision detection - so you can accelerate... >:) Jeff E (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto11 Event Rules Posted
|
|
Excerpt from contest rules: "The winner recieves 2 points for the win, the loser, none. A tie gives each player a single point." Well *I'm* going to wear a tie. An extra point every round - how can I lose? Wait - is this some tricky way of (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Upgrading RCX 1.0
|
|
That is exactly what you can do. Lego has released a 2.0 SDK, which includes the 2.0 firmaware (firm0328.lgo), as well as lots of other stuff for programming. I can't find it on their web site, so you can (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Upgrading RCX 1.0
|
|
Thanks Callum. What we are doing is trying to get to 2.0 to use some features in NQC. Am I making this too complicated? Can we just download the 2.0 firmware and skip the 1.5 upgrade? "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
