 | | Re: off topic "The simpsons"
|
|
"Martin Legault" <mlegault@nortelnetworks.com> wrote in message news:GrpFsu.5rC@lugnet.com... (...) not (...) go (...) No, it's okay - looks like you were right, but they blasted this as like a little subplot in the last SIX MINUTES of the show????? (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.loc.ca.on.tor)
|
| |
| | Re: off topic "The simpsons"
|
|
(...) Look like I was mislead, or there is 2 version 1 US and 1 canadian, I hope not I heard on the TV last week when I was in Iowa that they where supposed to go in Toronto or it sounded like that, I wasn't directly on front of the TV, sorry to (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.loc.ca.on.tor)
|
| |
| | Re: off topic "The simpsons"
|
|
"Richard Noeckel" <Shroud_of_kung_fu@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GrpDFt.n36@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) Are you guys sure this is the Canada episode? I'm showing them having just left a fair...? With very expensive looking bumper cars?? (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.loc.ca.on.tor)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
"Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C704CF8.B1B0E7...ers.com... (...) Yeah, if you're into the whole "vanishing block" routine. Dork :) Iain (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
1110 1010 1110 0000 humm, Ka-on, thank you for this pattern. here are a few that i use to test: 1111 1100 1000 1000 i called this on the stealth bomber. It forced a lot of diagonals for testing. As well, this is simple but a good test of distance (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: off topic "The simpsons"
|
|
(...) Thanx!!! =) --==Richard==-- (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.loc.ca.on.tor)
|
| |
| | off topic "The simpsons"
|
|
new episode tonigth, they are supposed to visit Toronto. At 8:00 on Fox and Global. Martin (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) I also have some problems with accuracy, but I am gona igonore it since there is little I can do without a complete redesign. The thing has enough momentum to push the whole 48x48 board around, there is little I can do in software. And don't (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | check you wires
|
|
I'm not sure why I never noticed this before BUT i just discovered that one of my wires had a nic in it. just enuff to throw my sensor reading off by a percent. I've known about the erratic readings and i coded them out early on. I just changed the (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
If it makes you feel any better, I've been struggling with the same thing myself. My ability to get the XY accuracy down to the top of a tooth IS slowing it down and worse, (like Calum said) it causes a vibration in the EOAT. I don’t have a time (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
