 | | Re: Robot – Accuracy
|
|
(...) On the top of the tooth....within 1/16th of an inch...every time. On top of that, my x-axis is the heaviest component (carries the Y-axis) and is driven 3:1 to the rack. (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Robot – Accuracy
|
|
(...) What do you mean by tooth? As in variability of a width of a tooth (ie, roughly 2mm wide (I mean, 1/8" of an inch or so :)) or like consistently on the top of the tooth? Calum (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: We're going to lose our position...
|
|
(...) I'd guess he's cut off the centre protusion, and glued a 1/2 bush on the back to make up for the decreased stability. ROSCO (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Robot – Accuracy
|
|
I haven’t finished my robot because I couldn’t get repeatable accuracy from the rotation sensors. I tried various solutions but nothing was giving me the accuracy I wanted. It was driving me nuts! I switched over to touch sensors, combined with a (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotation Sensors
|
|
(...) ....and me....I equally get upset at large-scale buyers who gouge the less informed consumer... (...) Yep...I think there is....also upsetting is people who design a set / maybe nice / maybe not (subject to interpretation) and then selling it (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
