 | | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
(...) My arm put the block down instead of dropping it, so it usually made good contact. But it is usually not perfect. I only ran it a few times though since I still got other problems to sort through. (...) No, the long time come from my slow (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
(...) Thank you for posting this. I have to ask, how accurate is your robot??? I will admit, that i have rarely got even CLOSE to 100% perfect block placement. so will a longer time give you better accuracy?? -- Chris Pretend this says something (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | The anti X pattern
|
|
Can everyone please refrain from posting their current "anti X" times? You're taking all the fun away from me as I work on mine, and you may end up discouraging someone from entering altogether :( It would be much nicer to be surprised on the day of (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
(...) Well my bot is currently doing 78 sec, if it is reading every blocks correctly. :p This mindstorm firmware language is super slow and I may need to learn LegOS. (24 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
<snip> (...) yes...that is true. But it also is a good source of income!! maybe I should X-post this to lugnet.offtopic.debate... :) Ben (24 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
