|
|
 | | Re: Naming: Request
|
| (...) Actually, this would be a good idea. I sort of miss it too. You don't have to spend a long time thinking of a catchy name that is legally trademarkable, then devise an extensive brand marketing scheme around it (Team Knob: The Goal is (...) (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Naming: Request
|
| I've noticed that at the more recent rtl events have had a lack of names for robots. IE, it's always just "X's Robot", where X = robot builder. Can everyone name their robots this time, like we used to like at, say, rtl4? Who could forget Rogue (...) (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dystopic Progression?
|
| (...) Oh, for real! I see… looks like I’ve read wayyyyyyyy to far into that comment. Thanx for the clarification Lar. -R (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Wow. This is track.
|
| (...) that does bring tears to eyes just looking at that....... all those boxes (unopened, of course), including the 5 freight loading stations...... :( Benjamin Medinets (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Is it wrong?
|
| (...) I think it all boils down to what you are trying to achieve with the model. If you feel like "cheating" and use non-lego items on it, that is fine...you are the maker.... just don't tell the kiddies looking at it, "that with enough bricks, (...) (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
