|
|
 | | Re: R22 - swinging bots
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) BEST 20 BUCKS I EVER SPENT! EVER!!!! That little snackmaster got me thru my bachelor decades... Dave K (17 years ago, 16-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: R22 - swinging bots
|
| (...) after a few beverages, many people agreed that there were a few ways to solve for this game. many people pointed out the multi motion of knee bend, leg straight pull rope, actions a child uses to swing on a swing. some people envisioned (...) (17 years ago, 15-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: R22 - swinging bots
|
| (...) huh? rude? ohhhhh i see, sorry. my por spelling and all that. we made merry. oops (blush) (...) hummmm, i THOUGHT i was clear. 2 sets of ropes was to imply that each round or game will have 2 robots racing against each other. each robot will (...) (17 years ago, 15-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: R22 - swinging bots
|
| (...) This is fascinating. I have just completed a swinging robot as a demonstration of a new sensor type. It turned out to be a lot harder to actually make it swing than I had imagined. Plus my version can't start from a standing start. It has to (...) (17 years ago, 15-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: R22 - swinging bots
|
| (...) Now, that's just rude. It may be appropriate, or even true, but I thought I'd point out the rudeness first. (...) OK, first, your obsessions (or insecurities?) are really creeping (nay, stampeding) into your post here. Second, do you mean two (...) (17 years ago, 15-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | R22 - swinging bots
|
| So, we dined, we ate, we had a HUGE turnout. we laughed, we cried, (well, mainly dave cried when i told him his robot sucks and he wont win the next robot games) we made mary.(1) with the overwhelming response from dinner, I think we had (...) (17 years ago, 15-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | What Chris does with his time...
|
| (URL) of hte other links on the page may be NSFW, but I didn't look too closely Dave K (17 years ago, 13-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: its dot calm
|
| (...) Go into technical writing. You've already mastered the art fo the footnote. (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: its dot calm
|
| (...) does that fence need to be painted with white-wash? (1) (...) Dave K 1 - who should dig out the 'classics' and reread 'em--it's only been 30 years since I last read anything from Samuel (2) 2 - though I did see him on syuch wonderful programs (...) (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: its dot calm
|
| (...) Yes, haven't you heard, sparse is the NEW black. (...) Too bad its not very polished, that would never past the muster with some other clubs members. Not mentioning any names *cough* goldenboy *cough* (...) Wow, thank the goddess of justice (...) (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
|
