|
|
 | | Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
| (...) While I'm not part of the rtltoronto clan, from the things I've seen you guys do, there is a lot of talent up there. If you want a suggestion for a 'project', how about the following: A pick and place system that can pull any variety of bricks (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
| (...) Yes, this is correct. The slowest station on the line will be the limiting factor in the production rate. That said, I don't think we need to "one up" anything, this is purely for fun. We've never done a large group collaborative project other (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Proposed Assembly Line Project
|
| (...) That's what I figured. Not having any of these motors, I cobbled it in LDRAW, and the clips in the model are too low. I figure I'll just make a dolly the same size from bricks and the old train wheels (with the metal axle from the 4.5V days) (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
| (...) That's right! We have to agree that everyone will try and meet some maximum time. No worm gears allowed! :) (...) Well, we could, but that would get pretty complicated in a hurry, I think. But it's not unlike the Montrac system - there are (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
| | | | | Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
| (...) Correct me if I'm wrong, but the cadence will be set by the slowest assembly cell, correct? So if your goal is a a fast cadence, you need *every* cell to meet at least that minimum requirement. Or, since you are using train track, with (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
|
