| | Re: YOU CAN POST NOW
|
|
(...) keep it up wise guy and tug-o-war will be sept 30! :) Chris Leader of all that i can see (18 years ago, 20-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
|
|
(...) Ah, always the diplomat... I vote for both (as ~if~ my vote counts) even before seeing Calum's version (already saw Dereks) only cause I'm so happy to see Derek back to posting!!! Janey "Red Brick" (18 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
|
|
(...) Added to this debate is the fact there are currently only three "realistic" trees, but 12 iconic trees already build. Using one over the other leads to a very deforested city. Personally I think we should use both. The more trees the better. (...) (18 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
|
|
(...) I'll try and get some pictures up after this weekend. I used to love the little iconic sphere and cone Lego trees...and always wanted a tall teardrop tree...but ever since I saw Sean Kenney or Spencer Rezkalla (I think it was him...) and the (...) (18 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
|
|
(...) Uhhh, don't we at least get pics (Mister-Calum-Camera-Man) to vote on it ourselves??? Janey "Realism is often overated, Red Brick" (18 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|