Subject:
|
Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 May 2006 21:42:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
728 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote:
> Personally I think we should use both. The more trees the better.
>
> Derek
Ah, always the diplomat...
I vote for both (as ~if~ my vote counts) even before seeing Calum's version
(already saw Dereks) only cause I'm so happy to see Derek back to posting!!!
Janey "Red Brick"
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
|
| (...) Added to this debate is the fact there are currently only three "realistic" trees, but 12 iconic trees already build. Using one over the other leads to a very deforested city. Personally I think we should use both. The more trees the better. (...) (18 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
