Subject:
|
Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 May 2006 17:51:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7318 times
|
| |
|
|
On 19-May-06, at 4:57 PM, Calum Tsang wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
> > In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote:
> > > Realistic it is!
> > >
> > > Calum
> >
> >
> > Uhhh, don't we at least get pics (Mister-Calum-Camera-Man) to vote
> > on it
> > ourselves???
> >
> > Janey "Realism is often overated, Red Brick"
>
> I'll try and get some pictures up after this weekend.
>
> I used to love the little iconic sphere and cone Lego trees...and
> always wanted
> a tall teardrop tree...but ever since I saw Sean Kenney or Spencer
> Rezkalla (I
> think it was him...) and the composite trees made of those little
> green
> bits...I'm all for the realistic.
>
> This debate is a little different, which you'll see once the
> pictures are up.
Added to this debate is the fact there are currently only three
"realistic" trees, but 12 iconic trees already build. Using one over
the other leads to a very deforested city.
Personally I think we should use both. The more trees the better.
Derek
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
|
| (...) I'll try and get some pictures up after this weekend. I used to love the little iconic sphere and cone Lego trees...and always wanted a tall teardrop tree...but ever since I saw Sean Kenney or Spencer Rezkalla (I think it was him...) and the (...) (20 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
