To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / *16088 (-5)
  Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
 
(...) Ah, always the diplomat... I vote for both (as ~if~ my vote counts) even before seeing Calum's version (already saw Dereks) only cause I'm so happy to see Derek back to posting!!! Janey "Red Brick" (19 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
 
(...) Added to this debate is the fact there are currently only three "realistic" trees, but 12 iconic trees already build. Using one over the other leads to a very deforested city. Personally I think we should use both. The more trees the better. (...) (19 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
 
(...) I'll try and get some pictures up after this weekend. I used to love the little iconic sphere and cone Lego trees...and always wanted a tall teardrop tree...but ever since I saw Sean Kenney or Spencer Rezkalla (I think it was him...) and the (...) (19 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Realistic versus Iconic Trees...solved!
 
(...) Uhhh, don't we at least get pics (Mister-Calum-Camera-Man) to vote on it ourselves??? Janey "Realism is often overated, Red Brick" (19 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: YOU CAN POST NOW
 
(...) Wow. And I thought it was only in .space that no one heard my screams... To be honest I've rather out of the loop the last month.... very busy at work (our department restructured), and off to Banff for a week. I'm still around, just no (...) (19 years ago, 19-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR