 | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> Forgot to mention where my issues are where the coding's concerned-- I wanted the setup routine to take care of, well, just about everyting--I didn't wnat to hard-code values into the 'bot but (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> Seriously, my code for scanning is as simple as it gets-- NQC'd-- task scanner_task() { while(true) { if (found_light == 1) //found light source--keep scanner on light source { (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| (...) Hear hear on that. Castors are evil. If you rotate and get lined up then drive forward, the castors will twist just enough to pull you off line. ...that could be contributing to the drunken lurching effect... I might have to try 4 wheel skid (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| (...) 'Cause in my (maybe no so) brilliant design I have a "probe" that is tied back to a touch sensor that needs to be inserted into the transfer opening. If the probe hits a wall/another bot, etc. then it will back off assuming it was a bad light (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| (...) But if you are "close" to the TO...then your precision usually is higher anyways--less movement, less slop? Here's some made up numbers to illustrate what I don't understand... If I read at time 0 at 30 degrees, a "contact". By the time I come (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
