 | | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) I thought that's why we included a guidelines sections. So we could differentiate between what is required and what isn't. This approach is more confusing, not less. Derek (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) I put in a fair amount of effort differentiating out should versus must. Any should is really a recommendation. Chris was super anal about how he didn't want to enforce certain items on people. Uniform colour and solid bricks was one of them. (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) This is a rule. (...) This is not. (...) I believe the intent is 'should' means 'must' otherwise the rule is meaningless and could be completely ignored. When writing design documents I am very careful not to use the word should. It renders (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: R20 - Project Y - block transfer Date set
|
|
(...) no no no.. I just dont like losing to a robot built by a 10 yo. (1) Besides, wasn't it you who referred to your own son as... umm.... let me remember.. oh ya, "..a brat." :) Chris Ya RIGHT. we ALL know who built harrys robot. (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) I'm OK with that. I just know it never made it into the "official" transfer set description, or the "guidelines", so I didn't know it had been agreed to. -Rob A> (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
