 | | Re: Talking point: beacon light on or off while robot in motion
|
|
(...) It's not you, it's the rest of these folks: Where's all the proponents of this game Chris so triumphantly paraded like contestants in a beauty pageant? DaveK? JohnG? Iain? Or are they all just happy to accept? I'd like to freeze the ruleset by (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Talking point: beacon light on or off while robot in motion
|
|
(...) Hey, I have a lot more to say, but I've been one, busy, and two, very sick. I don't think the discussion needs to be instantaneous, this is a message board, not a phone call. If you want to end discussion, then set a date for it, don't just (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Talking point: beacon light on or off while robot in motion
|
|
(...) Right, but why not demand a switched light as per the current rules, and then it's up to you to do whatever you want in addition? (...) The Square Brackets exist so people don't get confused with when the events are scheduled. There was a (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Talking point: beacon light on or off while robot in motion
|
|
(...) Excelent. I look forward to the web page update. Thank you. (...) This is a valid stratagy. I hope I didnt not leave you or any of the group or readers with the idea that the beacon light idea had to be an either or. In fact, a good builder (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Talking point: beacon light on or off while robot in motion
|
|
(...) Sure. (...) I look forward to the end of these stupid "Talking Point" subject lines. Calum (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
