 | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) Thanks Larry, I wanted to understand method by which my email address was harvested before address it to MOCPages. Clearly it's a design flaw, and not something more sinister which was one of my original concerns. Derek (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - anyone own a robot vacum?
|
|
(...) I wouldn't take that statement too seriously -- it's a lawyer spouting turf-talk, not a product review. Steve (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) It would take a little more development effort to do a hash, but ya. Ouch. I agree. Ouch. Not only that but it seems to vary across time, some of my creations have older email addresses embedded, presumably matching when I changed my emails as (...) (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) Now there's a serious design flaw. In fact the use of your email address in this way appears to be contrary to the MOCPages privacy policy. " We hate unsolicited e-mail just as much as everyone else. We will never distribute, sell, or abuse (...) (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately all the thumbnail images contain you address in the URL (right click and select view image and look at the name of the file). I assume this is where they've been harvested from. Tim (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
