 | | Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
|
| (...) Actually, I was assuming he wanted to make a cool GBC, and, in an attempt to create a really cool module, he decided to try and put a train to good use. Unlike all the train people that want to add a Mindstorms to their train layout, he wants (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
|
| (...) Ummm dunno about anyone else, but I certainly didn't make that assumption... ROSCO (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
|
| (...) I doubt it's a problem with the chip. In order for the DCC to send the signal to the chip, it must send a message pulse that sometimes either goes above 9v, or goes below 9v. The RCX has a maximum output of 9v. So, to send the signal, it must (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
|
| (...) hummmm what chip did you use? this one is rated to 1 amp, and IIRC, the stall is higher. and IIRC, (some more) the stall of the technic is LOWER. we'll see. maybe this is todays project. Chris (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) I'm going to give you an FYI, but if you DCC a 9v motor using the brick you're building, you get a diminished power output to the motor as oppsed to going straight 9 volts to the motor, or (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
