 | | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) Boy - I've been standing here ignoring this and hoping for a decision on a game, but feel I have to jump in here. I completely disagree that the rings were an end-run around the game rules. They were about the BEST interpretation of the (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) no one has EVER said your EOAT has to ENTER another bot to deposit a brick. hell, with a know size and hight for the HITW,just build a lego gun on a turret. that was my idea. (couples with a few wiskers to feel for the HITW) Chris (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) ok you lost me now. IF your shoe box has a lid and a HOLE in the WALL (HITW) then why are we arguing??? you just described my rule set of a closed hopper with a HITW. ????? (confused) (...) using daves original idea, a shoe box is a VERY GOOD (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) Yes, but if the scoring is the number of your blocks in other unique 'bots times the number of other unique blocks in yours, a box can't win--no blocks going into others... That said, if you have your box able to get blocks into other 'bots (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) I'm in for the currently proposed rules (vertical opening, etc...) Dave K -who would rather not show his working 'bot before the competition 'cause that kinda defeats teh purpose of (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
