 | | Re: the deed as I see it.
|
|
(...) HECK, you have 12", and we havent decided on a HITW or SIZE of the HITW. so there is NOTHING to stop you from building as many inputs as you can cram into 12" cubed. (...) the more i think about it, the more i like this idea. your score is (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Iain needs set up on LUGNET help
|
|
Iain sent me this: ---...---snip---...--- Hey Chris, Do you think you could do me a favour? I moved at the begining of september, and I can't figure out at all how to configure lugnet to let me post from my new email address. Do you think you could (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: the deed as I see it.
|
|
(...) OK, I'm beginning to like this HITW idea. Seems more interesting and challenging than having open-top hoppers driving around (or standing still). Who's to say that your bot can't be a square, with 3 HITW, one on each side, and on the 4th side (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: the deed as I see it.
|
|
(...) I have no problem with getting any EOAT into the square hole when the 'bots are lined up properly. I have a huge problem with getting the 'bots to line up properly. for example, if you're little square hole 'bot was facing the exact opposite (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: the deed as I see it.
|
|
(...) Sorry Chris I didn't mean to say SMALL hole in my last post, I just thought that the whole fact of doing the transaction might be a a little hard, unless both robots are co-operating (one waiting, the other unloading). Very nice creation, (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
