 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Interesting, I guess this is what you were trying to get at at dinner about a standardized interface. Your right this makes it much more challenging, and interesting. Although it nullifies one of my ideas. Which is fine, just less explosive. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Remember, the the winning entry (as determined by the scoring system) used this rubber band "powered" mechanism: (URL) elevate and close the latch. I knew that some felt this was "cheap" (including myself), but honestly, it outperformed (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) As it turns out, a fish sticker would not win a sumo compeition. While it's a good strategy to not-lose, it would also not win very many matches, and would finish in the middle of the pack. (...) My suggestion would be a minimum weight (like 1 (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) If one of the rules will be that you have to have a hole in the wall into which the bricks will be loaded, then we might need to use the RCX to actually locate the hole. I think that by making that one of the rules, it might make it a little (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) how about gravity??? see, you cant just say your bot ~NEEDS~ something just to make it a bot. you need to add a challenge that will make it easier to USE the RCX then not. For the BoP game, if you didnt want to see the tower robots, make a (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
