 | | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Hmm, I think that a) getting over the bit of beam sticking down to keep the thing in stable equlibrium, and b) working through that tiny opening in the structure will present insurmountable headaches. I don't see that happening very easily at (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) LOL! I was actually thinking of just a lone 2x4 brick. (...) I vote for (b) lower your end of the beam (raise your opponent's end). My thoughts: If we want to RAISE our end, then we would could end up with "sumo on a 2x4" because each robot (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Quite you. That's what I was going to do. Derek (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) Okay, if anyone builds a robot that "leaps off" the beam, more power to them. That would be amazing. Unless they are kamakaze.* Besides, that doesn't guarentee you a win at all. (...) And what did we decide about that? I think it was that we (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) For me, it's more difficult to raise my opponents end. That stops the JeffE sticker thing. So I think we should work on the premise of bringing our end down. (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
|
(...) I think you at least have to stay on the beam. Otherwise, EVERYONE will jump off the beam. What kind of a contest is that? The other issue I can think of is JeffE style loopholing :). I can see JeffE driving up from California, leaving a Lego (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) Hi Kevin, I'll be the first to say that Larry has a legitimate gripe. The question is, can Lenny bring the very offending action in JLUG to lugnet, and then punish Chris on lugnet for the offense? Lenny's justification for "indefinitly (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
Iain Hendry wrote in message ... (...) out of (...) work (...) To make the parallel true, though, the porn would have to name or otherwise specifically involve either your boss or a co-worker, and name your place of work (as Chris's post on JLUG (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) I would have to agree, although, if it were my board (thank goodness it isn't) I'd probably have ended up banning a couple of folks for a while (myself included, I do seem to have some bad days).... But as I've said before.. not my pond. (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) No, the primary reason will be said to be the original "Wish's" (sic) post. The justification is weak, as others have pointed out, because there are other examples of others who have put that sort of sentiment out but they haven't been timed (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
