| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Joseph Greene wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Antonishen wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:24:07 GMT, Joe Greene <white_volg@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > <OPINION>
> > > > Posting the link to the personal assault here, constitutes flying his kite in
> > > > both places. The assault, meaning the contest, was unconscionable. Posting
> > > > reference to the assault on this system was equally so.
> > > > </OPINION>
> > >
> > >
> > > Just to clarify, it was Lenny, in
> > > http://news.lugnet.com/org/ca/rtltoronto/?n=13560 that posted the link
> > > here in lugnet, not Chris.
> > >
> > > -Rob A>
> >
> > Ok, then I tender my apologies to Chris regarding the posting on Lugnet of the
> > link to the contest.
>
> Well done Joseph. Seriously. Thank you.
>
> This new information brings up an interesting twist and question, but first I
> will adamntly say that what Chris did was wrong, in any forum.
>
> If Chris did the contest completely outside of lugnet, and a third party brings
> it to lugnet, is it really *just* to "revoke his right to post indefinitely?" I
> don't think so, *if* that was the primary reason for his "time out".
>
> Kevin
I would have to agree, although, if it were my board (thank goodness it isn't)
I'd probably have ended up banning a couple of folks for a while (myself
included, I do seem to have some bad days).... But as I've said before.. not my
pond.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
47 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
