 | | Don't worry, petitions to come later...
|
|
I opened the National Post this weekend and found this charming article about a My Little Pony fan convention in the UK: (URL) thought this was pretty cute until I realized they're where Lego fans were in 1995. Soon they'll start having threads (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) That's one of the more prominent. Others could include discouraging newcomers to the hobby, painting Lego enthusiasts to the general public in a bad light, etc. But since we're intrinsically linked to the Lego Company (there are no other (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) Hey JoJo! I think both sides of this flame war are guilty of this. To various degrees there are worse offenders, but when people rightly pointed out that this disparaging letter would do more harm than good, they were shouted down. I think, (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) --lots of stuff deleted --- Calum et al, I think the main concern here seems to be that the sending of this letter will harm you, by affecting TLC's view of you/our AFOL community? I, personally disagree with the tone, and therefore will not (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
Johannes 'Jojo' Koehler wrote: < Stuff we've heard before > In principal I agree with what you are saying. However I take exception to where you are saying it. You need to pay attention to the forum you are posting to. I've already laid the smack (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Chamber?
|
|
MWAHAHAHA!!! That's awesome. -Stefan- (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Ignore this post (Re: Open letter ...)
|
|
(...) I think the thing that bothers a large number of people is that it's impossible to ignore. There was a group created for discussions on this subject. If someone has an interest in reading and posting on this, they should read lugnet.color. (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
Hello! (...) end. Hm, browsing through this Letter-to-CEO-thread I see those who agree to the letter and disagree to the colour change just saying "I agree to the letter", name, age. Those who do not agree to the letter (and possibly agree to the (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Chamber?
|
|
(...) It wouldn't fit, vignettes are only supposed to be 8x8! (Eh, what? You meant the CHAIR, not my head? Oh! never mind... good suggestion.) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Boat Motor
|
|
(...) I don't know if that will work. I'm not sure if a single 2x2 set of dots will stick to the hull given than the motor is pushing an inch down from where that piece is. Of course, the motor doesn't put out a lot of force, but it might not stick (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.boats, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Star Chamber?
|
|
(...) Nice work Bruce, but you forgot ++Lar's throne/old Star Trek style captain's chair. -Keith (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Boat Motor
|
|
Anyone know if the New boat motor in [LEGOSet 4669] or [LEGOSet 7244] can be attached to the botton of, and provide enough ballast to, the old boats like [LEGOSet 3111] that use the ballast weight to replace the ballast weight? I was thinking it (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.boats, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Chamber?
|
|
(...) LOL!! What I want to know is, when they head for lunch, do they march along singing "Dink-dink, dink-dink-dink-DINK DINK dink..." a la "Spaceballs"? ;) KDJ LUGNETer #203 (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Star Chamber?
|
|
(...) Hmm, would that look something like (URL) this>? (URL) Bruce (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) It was funny though. And made the point. (...) Apology accepted on behalf of just me. But we're still not mailing you the instruction manual. (because there isn't one!) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Steve's Ball hanging out at Wendy's
|
|
(...) Here's a moronic ditty I remember from a few decades back... Ronald McDonald stuck his Big Mac into Wendy's Hot-'N-Juicy, shortly after Burger King was born - he was a Whopper! -Patrick (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) K, that was a little too snarky, even for me. I apologize. Dave K -note: no admin or anyone else e-mailed me to tell me to rethink my post. I just read it again and realized that it really was too snarky. (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) We in rtlT have control over what is spotlighted? Wow! We in rtlT have control over who bringswhat thread into our NG? That's great! We in rtlT have control over who can post in this NG? Perfect! That'll make things much better for us--nowif (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) I did say we were bothguilty of it. So there you are. (...) And you weren't interested in any of my posts that were not 'kissups to TLC' or me stating that I wasn't in the 'anti-colourchange' camp. So we're both doing it--where, in the end, (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
