 | | Re: Calum's gonna love this
|
|
(...) Or a snooze. Or catching some zeds. ROSCO (21 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Human Powered Helicopter
|
|
(...) Ahh, okay, now I bitecha. Yeah the Kaman K-Max arrangement is the closest. Not exactly coaxial, but pretty darn. But unfortuntely it rhymes with orange. ;] KDJ P.S., hey what's Aaron up to these days? ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Ontario, Canada (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Calum's gonna love this
|
|
(...) There are, and I caught it. Just figured he knew he was being a baby .... Oops, now I'm gonna catch it. Did they say they were coming to BrickFest. Think I'll have to rely on my superior knowledge of the room layout at GMU to find somewhere to (...) (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: you're gonna love this
|
|
(...) David, ho-hum. should you really go to brickfest, or would it be better to say home and take a nappy? (whatever you take that to mean...) Here are the Top 10 reasons to stay home, instead of going to Brickfest 10) Hundreds of LEGO freaks (...) (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Calum's gonna love this
|
|
(...) No, I think you had it right the first time. :-) Derek (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | RE: Calum's gonna love this
|
|
(...) Dave, I really hope there are no Brits (or Aussies or Jamaicans) reading this post because you are impying that you are about to soil yourself. Of course, we know you actually need a _nap_, which is, I believe a kip across the pond. Ralph (21 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Calum's gonna love this
|
|
(...) Well, if it'll encourage you to stop recycling that Kodak camera and buy a new digital camera, I'm all for it. (...) The presentation is more a kick in the pants for me to finish my thesis work by summarizing all the literature review I did, (...) (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Human Powered Helicopter
|
|
(...) I think I meant there doesn't seem to be any commercial examples, agreeing with what Ivan posted... ...Ivan had some very specific criteria for his topic of discussion: -Non Russian -Coaxial -Commercial/Civilian -Rhymes with "orange" -Not made (...) (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Human Powered Helicopter
|
|
(...) The tandem rotor aircraft, e.g., CH-46 Sea Knight, CH-47 Chinook, have counter-rotating rotors. KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Ontario, Canada (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Human Powered Helicopter
|
|
(...) I think I hear my cue... ;] Those claims, out of context, are misleading/exaggerated. The aircraft is certainly affected by winds, just not in the same way or with the same unique problems as a conventional tail-rotored aircraft (although it (...) (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
