|
|
 | | Re: Ahem, onwards to rtl16, thank you
|
| (...) : shiver : The thought of having to machine parts that are small enough to handle THOSE parts make me want to hide. That's frightening. (...) I expect their damn sales team to send me the right .DXF drawing when I ask for an 85VHRB with LIGHT (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Ahem, onwards to rtl16, thank you
|
| (...) Is there a reason to eliminate the battery box solutions? I understand if RCX-less robots are allowed, Rob will show up with something really cool, that flys up the rope, and wins the event, but doesn't have any program. What's wrong with (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Logic Only - Early results (the polls are still open)
|
| (...) It was quite a good game. I have the transcript at home (forgot to bring it back from lunch). I think it went to 37 or 39 chips. (...) I don't recall seeing your code, but, yes, I will share mine. (...) Kevin has some really good sig file (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Ahem, onwards to rtl16, thank you
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) Well, an idea proposed is that we use the 4x4 playfield, have 2 ropes dangling down within the perimeter, and have the ends of said ropes corresponding to the starting square colours. So (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Logic Only - Early results (the polls are still open)
|
| (...) Yes, it is a bit risky. Congratulations on the first win. My code is not tested very much, sooooo..... Good luck on the second. Was it a long game or did I die early? Would you be willing to share code after this is done, so I can see what you (...) (21 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
